Ensuring inclusion, diversity, equity and patient input in the development of novel drugs and medical devices has become well accepted in health care. However appropriate implementation of these elements has been a challenge for many. Only by implementing these conscious inputs can patient outcomes be improved and health disparities in marginalised groups be addressed.
Australian Health Journal spoke to Gillian Mason, Consumer and Community Involvement Lead at Hunter Medical Research Institute in Newcastle, NSW on this topic discussed at the recent ARCS Conference in Sydney.
Gillian is a proudly disabled and chronically ill health consumer and patient representative who is also a physiotherapist-researcher with more than 18 years’ experience of the health system from ‘both sides of the bedside’. She is passionate about improving access, inclusion and equity in healthcare for consumers and workforce. In 2021 she was one of 25 Australian women to be awarded the inaugural Brilliant Women in Digital Health Award for transforming the ways that people’s lived experience is valued and included in the design of human-centred, digitally enabled, accessible health systems.
The clinical trial sector needs to provide robust processes that ensure trust is built within these communities – and that processes are transparent and inclusive and importantly demonstrate a commitment to ethical and equitable practices.
“Inclusion and diversity are more than just words, they need to be backed up with meaningful actions and considerations of what they truly mean.”
“When we talk about diversity, we’re often centering whiteness.”, says Gillian.
According to Gillian, efforts to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion in clinical trials should address issues of racism, homophobia, and ableism to create a more inclusive environment
She states, ”Everyone who lives in Australia deserves access to high quality health care. They should be able to access these things without a huge burden or expense to them. It’s a human right to access health care.”
Having an inclusive approach to clinical trials is not just a nice thing to do, but it is essential for ensuring that treatments and medical services work for the entire population, rather than just a small group of people.
As Consumer and Community Involvement Lead at Hunter Medical Research Institute in NSW, Gillian manages the Research Volunteer Register and provides strategic advice, education, training and mentorship around consumer and community involvement in all stages of the research process to research teams.
Within the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care, Gillian is also the Deputy Chair of the Health Technology Assessment Consumer Consultative Committee, and a member of the Medical Service Advisory Committee.
You Might also like
-
New clinical research entity first to operate across both Australia and New Zealand
Over the past 30 years, 18,000 clinical trials that have been registered in Australia, with the sector contributing $1.4 billion to Australia’s economy annually. Trials are a critical aspect of evidence-based medicine, and are essential for testing how new treatments, tests and vaccines will work. In New Zealand they contribute $146 million to the New Zealand economy.
To capitalise on this unique position and growth, a coordinated multi-site clinical research operation was missing, until now.
-
Supporting women in arthroplasty, surgery & orthopaedic oncology
Associate Professor Claudia Di Bella is an academic orthopaedic surgeon based in Melbourne, specialising in orthopaedic oncology and complex joint reconstruction. Originally trained at the world-renowned Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute (Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli) in Bologna, Italy, she moved to Australia in 2010 and was awarded Fellowship of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons in 2013.
-
Sharing the same goals in value-based procurement
Value-based procurement (VBP) is a journey, not a sprint. It’s about putting the patient at the centre of quality affordable healthcare through changes in procurement practices for medical technologies. Patient outcomes drive value and sustainability, not just price. The bigger picture indicates that VBP will create system cost saving through benefitting patients, rather than trying to attain the reverse – a win-win outcome.